From John Curry, December 17, 2008
Subject: Re: Take a hint, STRS...do like Pennsylvania's STRS did....eliminate bonuses for investments people... even though they also did better than their peers!
Tim,
Thank you for your reply. Maybe they are just "studying" the bonus program at this time and that they are "contractually obligated" at this time to award the bonuses. This contract will come to an end sooner or later. The Pennsylvania Governor prefers "sooner." This isn't the only news coverage of this situation. In the pennlive.com coverage of this (furnished below) It states:
"The system's board voted Friday to end the program at the end of this month. Market conditions and other pressures led to the board's decision to rescind the practice, said Jeffrey Clay, the system's executive director." Sounds like Mr. Jeffrey Clay has a whole bunch of media correcting to do as this additional article, if I read it correctly, states that the Board has now already voted to quash the bonus program. Do we have a case of "media gone wild" here and have the facts of this incident been totally reversed? Here is that article from pennlive.com
John
base/news/122939880633070.xml&coll=1
Bonuses for losing money
From PennLive.com, December 16, 2008
BY JAN MURPHY
The Patriot-News
In a year when the school employees' pension system lost $1.8 billion, the system's investment staff still received more than $854,000 in bonus payments.
Twenty-one members of the Public School Employees' Retirement System's investment staff received bonuses for their work in the 2007-08 fiscal year, which ended June 30. The bonuses range from $9,720 to $106,223.
The average bonus is $40,672. The system's investment staff earn base salaries between $63,179 and $251,542.
But the bonus program is coming to an end.
The system's board voted Friday to end the program at the end of this month.
Market conditions and other pressures led to the board's decision to rescind the practice, said Jeffrey Clay, the system's executive director.
"There was some concern given the unprecedented markets at this point, plus ... across this country, there are issues raised with respect to incentive compensation for investment professionals in this market," Clay said.
Gov. Ed Rendell was among those objecting to the bonuses. He sent a letter in November to system officials advising against awarding them this year.
"Given the fund's recent performance and the serious financial challenges now facing the commonwealth as a whole, the payment of large bonuses to PSERS employees would be inappropriate and indefensible," Rendell wrote.
System officials, however, said lawyers advised they had a contractual obligation to pay the incentive payment, since they were provided for in board policy.
Investment staff will still be eligible to receive bonuses for work done between July 1 and Dec. 31, Clay said. He said all incentives are based on objective criteria that are independently verified.
In the first quarter of the 2008-09 fiscal year, which ended September
30, the school employee pensions system's investments lost 11 percent.
Going forward, Clay said the board might consider raising the investment staff's base salaries to keep their compensation competitive, or it might hire an outside consultant to offer some ideas.
The bonuses are intended to supplement base salaries that a market study shows are lower than the going rate for professional investors to entice them to earn the best returns possible for the fund, system officials said.
While the investment staff's work in the last fiscal year did result in a 2.8 percent loss on investments, system officials pointed out their in-house investors outperformed their peers nationally. Their peers' median return was a negative 4.56 percent for the same period.
Steve Nickol, vice chairman of the system's board, said he understands that the payments are huge to people who already receive among the fattest salaries in state government. But he added that "they're some of the few people in state government who make money, generally."
Investment staff at the other state pension system, the State Employees' Retirement System, are also eligible for bonuses if they hit at least an 8.5 percent rate of return. Considering the losses that the fund experienced this year, system spokesman Robert Gentzel said, "I can say with a high degree of certainty that they will not be getting incentive payments for 2008."
For 2007, nine out of its 16 investors received a total of $193,803 in bonuses for helping the fund gain 17.2 percent in value, Gentzel said. Those bonuses ranged from $9,337 to $55,947. The average was $21,534. (The state workers' retirement system operates on a calendar year).
Sen. John Eichelberger, R-Blair County, welcomed the news about the school employees' pension board decision to end the bonus program. He said he plans to reintroduce legislation to ban bonuses to most state government employees when the new legislative session starts in January.
His proposal allows for an exception for bonuses that are based on objective criteria like the ones that the pension systems offered.
But he said, "it still was awkward because we were making an exception for somebody. If it's a good rule, it should rule across the board."
Using internal staff to manage about 30 percent of the school employees' pension fund's nearly $55 billion in assets and operate the system's in-house trading room saves about $12 million annually, system officials said.
That saving alone is a solid reason to reward investment staff incentives for good performance, said Keith Brainard, research director for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators. He noted that Pennsylvania was among a minority of states that offered incentive payments to investment staff.
He said, "I think the fact that more don't do it has more to do with the politics of the issue rather than the merits of it."
From Tim Myers, December 17, 2008
Subject: RE: Take a hint, STRS...do like Pennsylvania's STRS did....eliminate bonuses for investments people... even though they also did better than their peers!
John,
In a letter from the Pennsylvania Executive Director, Jeffery Clay on Monday, Jeffery told me that the bonus have NOT been eliminated. They are going through a study of the bonuses just like we are. In fact, we are a month ahead of them on this. The second line of the article in question is misleading at best. The committee tasked with making the determination has NOT reached a conclusion yet.
Tim
<< Home