Kathie Bracy to STRS Board, April 25, 2013
To the members of the STRS Retirement Board:
As you are well aware, there are irregularities in the ballot language in
the 2013 election, creating confusion among many retirees and which will produce
unintended results in the election currently in progress for the two retired
seats on the STRS board unless something is done about it.
Assuming the personal integrity of each member of the STRS board would
never permit such an injustice to prevail, I wish to know precisely what the
board intends to do to rectify the situation. The only right (and maybe lawful?)
thing to do, as you are also well aware, is to invalidate the 2013 election
altogether and run it again, whatever the cost, with corrected ballot language.
Since whoever authored and/or approved the carelessly written current
ballot language clearly did not understand the possible confusion it would cause
for many, I would strongly suggest you create a panel to study it carefully and
submit it to some language experts before putting out a new ballot.
At the April 18, 2013 STRS board meeting, Dennis Leone outlined exactly
what the problems are with the ballot language. He asked repeatedly how this
could have happened, and his questions were valid; yet you, the STRS board, met
them with stony silence (I was present during his speech and was totally stunned
that not one board member had the courtesy of offering him even the slightest
semblance of a response).
You can only imagine what your constituents must think of such a cold
reception from their board. Had you been a child in my third grade class, you
would have missed a few recesses for this kind of rudeness, and I'd have had a
little talk with your parents. If you are still teaching, you can imagine what
your next evaluation would look like if you treated your principal this way. If
you're not teaching, try this out on your boss sometime.
You have a chance to make things right; please do, so that justice will
prevail and you won't go down in STRS history as the board that approved a
crooked election at the expense of retired teachers and got away with it. How
many more times are you going to slap us in the face?
I hope to receive your response in a prompt manner. Further silence on your
part shall be interpreted as your support of the ballot language as it currently
stands, and no intention on your part to acknowledge or correct any part of it.
Thank you.
Kathie Bracy
STRS retiree
<< Home