Monday, August 28, 2017
STRS Board Uses Fiscal Year Calendar to Deny July - December
Retirees Several Hundred Million Dollars in COLA Benefits
The original plan to deny millions of dollars to the July through December
retirees was most likely conceived prior to the STRS Board's 2013 COLA
suspension and percentage adjustment. At some point when the plan to suspend
and reduce the COLA percentage was being discussed someone at STRS noticed that
by starting COLA suspensions and/or COLA percentage reduction by using the
Fiscal Calendar (July 1 - June 30) instead of an Annual Calendar (January 1-
December 31) would save STRS millions of dollars by denying millions of dollars
to the July through December retirees.
The deception was based on convincing the July through December retirees
back in 2013 that they would not be losing any money compared to the January
through June retirees. It started by STRS informing the July through December
retirees that they would be the first retirees to have their COLA suspended and
they would be the first to get the new reduced 2% COLA the following year when
the January through June retirees would have to wait a year before getting the
reinstated 2% COLA. The majority of the July through December retirees did not
see the inequity in this method and they were convinced that this was fair and
all retirees were getting their COLA suspended for one year.
With no major pushback from the July through December retirees for using
the Fiscal Calendar method to implement suspensions and/or to reduce COLA
percentages the STRS Board saw another opportunity to save additional millions
of dollars at the expense of the July through December retirees. By informing
all retirees that there would be a multiyear COLA suspension the focus would be
on all retirees losing several years of COLA and there would be little or no
pushback on how the Fiscal Year method was again going to deny several hundred
millions of additional dollars to the July through December retirees.
In 2013 as a result of the deceptive use of the Fiscal Calendar for COLA
suspensions and/or COLA percentage reductions by the STRS Board retirees that
retired in July - December 2012 with a $40,000 pension have already lost
approximately $2400 compared to retirees that retired in January - June 2012
with the same $40,000 pension. Because the January - June retirees did receive
a 2017 COLA while the July - December retirees were denied the 2017 COLA, and
the fact that the new COLA suspension will last a minimum of five years, the
July - December retirees will lose an additional $6000 compared to the January -
June retirees. As a result of the STRS Board's decision in 2013 to use the
Fiscal Calendar to implement COLA suspensions and/or COLA percentage reductions
the July - December retirees will lose an additional $8400 ($2400+$6000) when
compared to the January - June retirees.
It is important to note that all July through December retirees
that retired prior to 2013 are experiencing these huge additional financial
losses that the January through June retirees aren't experiencing. This
inequity is a direct result of the STRS Board using the Fiscal Calendar to
implement COLA suspensions and/or COLA percentage reductions instead of using
the Annual Calendar when implementing changes. If $8400 is the average loss for
each July through December retiree and if there are approximately 80,000 July
through December retirees the additional loss in pension funds compared to the
January through June retirees is a staggering $672 million. (**see
info/chart)
** STRS Retirees Suffering Huge Losses, Some
More Than Others
The examples below reflect retirees that retired in 2012 with a $40,000
pension and a $1200 annual COLA. The first two June and July columns (A and B)
show the results of what the STRS retirees would have been granted without COLA
suspensions and/or COLA percentage reductions. Columns A and B show that the
June and July retirees would have received the same pension amounts through
2021. Until July 1st 2013 the annual COLA was 3% and a COLA was paid every year
to all retirees since 1971.
The third and fourth columns (C and D) show the actual reduced
retirement payments due to the STRS changes, reductions and finally the total
elimination of the COLA at least through 07/01/21. This results in a minimum
loss of $28,800 on an original annual pension of $40,000 for the June retiree.
So you are basically losing over 70% of a year's pension over the time covered
in this chart if you are a January-June retiree.
The other travesty is the disparate treatment of the July through
December retirees. As the result of STRS's use of the Fiscal Calendar in lieu of
an Annual Calendar for COLA suspensions and/or percentage reductions during the
4 year period between 2013 and 2016 July-Dec retirees were behind in purchasing
power by over 1% on average. When the STRS Board terminated the COLA on
07/01/2017 this purchasing power loss grew to 3% or $1200 per year since the
Jan-June retirees received another 2% COLA on their anniversaries that the
July-Dec retirees did not get. Therefore, Jan-June retirees have a $1200
pension benefit advantage that is additive every year going forward starting
July 1, 2017 through July 1 2021. This advantage is $1200 x 5 years, at
minimum, before the next quinquennial review. That's $6000 more in pension
payments over that period for about half of all retirees while the other half
receive $0. Therefore, when you add the losses since July 1, 2013 through July
1, 2016 which is $2400 and the $6000 they will lose over the next five years the
July-Dec retirees will end up at least $8400 behind the Jan-June retirees in
total pension payments over the period described, a loss of 93% of their
original yearly pension. If the suspension of the COLA continues beyond 2021
the $8400 difference will continue to grow by $1200 for each additional year.
Approximately half of the 160,000 STRS retirees have retirement
anniversaries between January and June. Therefore, 80,000 X $8400 =
$672,000,000 will be paid to the Jan - June retirees at the pension asset
expense of the 80,000 July-Dec retirees.
This is why the SERS System is asking for a January, 2018 COLA cessation
date. It eliminates the inequity that the STRS plan has promoted.
Click image to enlarge
<< Home