Molly Janczyk to Mr. Nehf and STRS Board: Where is the solution?
From Molly Janczyk, February 24, 2009
Subject: STILL NO RESPONSE: Nehf, STRS Board: [News] February Board News Details Retirement Board Actions and Discussions
Mr. Nehf and STRS Board:
WHERE ANYWHERE DO I SEE ANY KIND OF SOLUTION BEYOND COSTING RETIREES MORE IN PREMIUMS???? WHERE IS PUTTING EVERYTHING ON THE TABLE INCLUDING:
1. INCREASING THE YEARS FOR RETIREMENT
2. SLIDING SCALES FOR PREMIUMS SO THOSE WITH LESS PAY LESS AND THOSE WITH MORE PAY MORE? A PROPORTIONATE PERCENT OF PENSION TOWARD HC PREMIUMS TO LEVEL THE PLAYING GROUND A BIT
3. MORE BENEFITS FOR CAREER EDUCATORS WITH THOSE WORKING LESS YEARS PAYING MORE IN ALL AREAS: RX's, DEDUCTIBLES AND OUT-OF-POCKETS. (DISABILITY WOULD BE A SEPARATE AREA ENTIRELY).
4. RETOOLING ALL AND ANY AREAS THAT ARE INEQUITABLE
Subject: STILL NO RESPONSE: Nehf, STRS Board: [News] February Board News Details Retirement Board Actions and Discussions
Mr. Nehf and STRS Board:
WHERE ANYWHERE DO I SEE ANY KIND OF SOLUTION BEYOND COSTING RETIREES MORE IN PREMIUMS???? WHERE IS PUTTING EVERYTHING ON THE TABLE INCLUDING:
1. INCREASING THE YEARS FOR RETIREMENT
2. SLIDING SCALES FOR PREMIUMS SO THOSE WITH LESS PAY LESS AND THOSE WITH MORE PAY MORE? A PROPORTIONATE PERCENT OF PENSION TOWARD HC PREMIUMS TO LEVEL THE PLAYING GROUND A BIT
3. MORE BENEFITS FOR CAREER EDUCATORS WITH THOSE WORKING LESS YEARS PAYING MORE IN ALL AREAS: RX's, DEDUCTIBLES AND OUT-OF-POCKETS. (DISABILITY WOULD BE A SEPARATE AREA ENTIRELY).
4. RETOOLING ALL AND ANY AREAS THAT ARE INEQUITABLE
posted by Kathie Bracy at 10:29 PM
<< Home