NY Times: Social Security not expected to increase in 2010

From John Curry, May 2, 2009
Subject: Fw: [SeniorNews] SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT EXPECTED TO RISE - Noteworthy Senior News from Suddenly Senior

What Frank doesn't tell the readers is that, unlike STRS, Social Security does NOT tax any income over $102,000 (2008 cap - it changes yearly). So, millionaires love it because, once their annual wages exceed $102,000, they QUIT paying into Social Security. I'll bet the majority of workers who pay into Social Security don't know that. I'll bet if they did...they would become "steamed," wouldn't they?

Want to "shore-up" Social Security? Seriously raise the "cap" or eliminate it altogether! Of course, those with "deep pockets" would scream bloody murder, wouldn't they? Our President has suggested a strong upward adjustment of this cap but some in Congress don't want to touch this idea "with a 10-foot pole." They don't want to suffer the wrath of their wealthy campaign contributors, do they?

More info on the Social Security wage "cap" can be found by going to the Social Security link: http://www.ssa.gov/mystatement/maxtax.htm

I am surprised by the number of STRS retirees who don't realize that there is a "cap" on Social Security taxed wages. I guess many of them believe that Social Security taxes apply to all income...just like all educators' incomes are assessed at a 10% STRS rate but...not so with SS.

John

From Frank Kaiser, May 2, 2009
Subject: [SeniorNews] SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT EXPECTED TO RISE - Noteworthy Senior News from Suddenly Senior

SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT EXPECTED TO RISE IN 2010

NY Times, May 3, 2009
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON — For the first time in more than three decades, Social Security recipients will not get any increase in their benefits next year, federal forecasts show.

The absence of a cost-of-living adjustment, calculated under a formula set by law, will be a shock to older Americans already hit by plummeting home values, investment losses and rising health costs. More than 50 million people receive Social Security.

“Most seniors have never been through a year in which there was no Social Security COLA,” said David M. Certner, legislative counsel at AARP, the lobby for older Americans. Beneficiaries have received automatic cost-of-living adjustments every year since 1975. The increase this year was 5.8 percent.

In theory, low inflation is good for people on fixed incomes. But it is creating political and policy problems for Congress, which is just learning of the implications for Social Security and Medicare.

The forecasts, by the Obama administration and the Congressional Budget Office, indicate that Social Security beneficiaries will not receive any cost-of-living increase in 2010 or in 2011. The COLA is intended to preserve the purchasing power of Social Security, by increasing benefits to keep pace with consumer prices. In the last year, overall inflation has been low, largely because of the economic downturn and a decline in energy prices.

A freeze in Social Security benefits would have major implications for Medicare because the COLA, in effect, puts a cap on premiums for Part B of Medicare, which covers doctors’ services.

If there is no cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security, about three-fourths of beneficiaries will not see any change in their basic Part B premiums, federal officials said. But some beneficiaries do not have this protection and could face substantial increases in their Part B premiums.

In addition, millions of beneficiaries could see higher premiums for drug coverage, provided under Part D of Medicare.

Social Security and Medicare trustees will describe the outlook for benefits and premiums in their annual reports this month.

Officials have already said the condition of Medicare’s hospital insurance trust fund is deteriorating because of the recession, which has reduced payroll tax revenues, the main source of money for the fund. Spending on Social Security and Medicare totaled more than $1 trillion last year, accounting for more than one-third of the federal budget.

Most people on Medicare have Part B premiums deducted from their monthly Social Security checks. These premiums have historically increased much faster than Social Security benefits.

Under federal law, most Medicare beneficiaries have some protection. Their basic Part B premiums cannot rise more than the dollar amount of the cost-of-living increase in their Social Security checks. So if there is no COLA, their basic Part B premiums will not increase.

But one-fourth of Medicare beneficiaries are not protected by the law, and their premiums could increase.

Most Medicare beneficiaries pay a monthly Part B premium of $96.40. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the basic premium will rise to $119 next year and $123 in 2011 for those who are not protected under federal law.

Douglas W. Elmendorf, director of the Congressional Budget Office, predicted that inflation would remain low for several years, so Social Security might not pay a cost-of-living increase until January 2013. President Obama’s budget assumes no increase in 2010 or 2011, then a 1.4 percent COLA in 2012.

Mr. Certner, from AARP, described the outlook for consumers: “If, as expected, there is no COLA in Social Security next year but premiums for drug coverage increase, as expected, millions of beneficiaries will see their Social Security checks reduced for the first time.”