Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Molly Janczyk: OEA's Executive Committee Report


From: Molly Janczyk
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Subject: OEA: January Executive Committee Report


OEA, CORE , FYI, HAS NOT endorsed a candidate(s) yet. Thurs. we are interviewing as you know 4 candidates seeking our endorsement, including your Mark Meuser. We voted to support Prof. Hall's petition process. So like you, OEA, to take a sentence out of context when others in the room found Prf. Hall highly qualified. I believe the statement to which you refer was responding to time available.

I suggest ALL OEA attend Thurs. Sublett Rm, 2nd flr to actually hear the candidates recorded statements just for this type of smoke screen you love to put forward.

Shame on you. Don't you learn? Ask yourselves WHY your members didn't vote is a better question and then look in the mirror. We will make every effort to show your shabby attempts to undermine candidates in negative patter. We will do as we have always done, present facts for members to verify. Bill L. tried to still underscore Leone's research until I asked him for just ONE wrong fact and he could not provide it. I asked who the liars were: Asbury who provided the facts from STRS, the investigative reporters who won awards and praises for their research verifying all the facts or the OEC who found the facts violations of the law. He was silent and said, There was a lot of info in the report.

You take a statement out of an entire presentation and defile it looking for something anything you can pounce upon. It is cheap, shabby and banal.

Grow up and fight a clean election ON THE STRENGTHS OF YOUR CANDIDATES!
Larry KehresMount Union Collge
Division III
web page counter
Vermont Teddy Bear Company