Thursday, June 29, 6000
Tuesday, February 15, 4000
STRS Ohio Watchdogs: a public Facebook group you can join
Sunday, August 27, 3950
Have you joined the Ohio STRS Member Only Forum on Facebook?
Click image to enlarge
Monday, June 25, 3900
Monday, June 24, 3850
Wednesday, May 28, 3800
Friday, February 27, 3750
Sunday, April 11, 3700
Thursday, March 10, 3650
Friday, February 24, 3550
Monday, April 29, 3450
I know, it's weird.........
Monday, February 24, 3400
This is an abbreviated version of the original 'Handy links' post. Click here to view a more complete list. (Some of it is old.)
State legislators.......State of Ohio website
Tuesday, February 24, 3350
Dennis Leone's STRS Report to ORTA, March 2007
Tuesday, February 23, 3300
Sunday, October 20, 2024
Edward Siedle: Ohio Teacher Pension Documents Finally Released To Us Reveal Imprudent Investment Should Never Have Been Made
Pension Warriors by Edward Siedle
OCT 20, 2024
The ugly details of a grossly imprudent $525 million Panda Power gamble STRS Ohio lost, reveals why the Forever Imprudent pension has been stonewalling public records requests for years. Lots to hide.After nearly 4 years of public records litigation, the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio finally released to us offering documents related to just one of the hundreds of high-risk, costly private funds the pension has been gambling on in secret. The damning details of this single investment—disclosed in the offering documents to anyone who took the time to read them—reveals why the pension has been fighting for years to keep all its private investment stinkers secret. Lots to hide.
Saturday, October 19, 2024
Robin Rayfield to STRS board: ".....over the years of turmoil here, the membership has spoken very loudly and clearly that change is necessary.
The membership has spoken very loudly and clearly that change is necessary!
Robin Rayfield's speech to STRS board
October 17, 2024
My name is Dr. Robin Rayfield. I am the Executive Director of ORTA. Thanks for the opportunity.
I had prepared remarks, but I'm going to deviate from them.
I think it's important to say thank you for the recent action to try to do something to help all parties.
We've always been about fixing the system, not simply about COLA.
But over the years of turmoil here, the membership has spoken very loudly and clearly that change is necessary.Unfortunately, the motivation, or the information underneath that desire for change, has often been characterized by management primarily as misinformation.
Understand that misinformation, if I don't agree with it, I call it misinformation. However, if I agree with it, it's information. So, I think we all have to recognize that.I've suggested two simple things, at no cost, that would help fix the trust and, we think, would help put STRS on a good track.
The first is, comply with the transparency that we have all asked for. There is a magistrate's order that said share the documentation behind the alternative investments.
The second thing we could do, very related, is move out of those opaque investments, and increase our passive investment strategies. The Auditor of State has confirmed we would do better. Save hundreds of millions of dollars to get, maybe better, but certainly similar, returns.
The last thing I would say is this: last month you did a great presentation on purchasing power. I wouldn't have been able to do it, but it was great. We've gone backward 21% in the last decade.
In that same decade, STRS compensation increased by 58%.
There's a disconnect between us being a partner. It's not a partnership if one person pays all the bills and the other person reaps all the benefits from those sacrificing.
Thank you.
Friday, October 18, 2024
Blade Editorial: The coming crisis is a manmade disaster by imprudent Ohio lawmakers. Simply requiring state pensions to make the terms of their investment contracts transparent would be enough to keep them out of one-sided deals like Panda Power.
Toledo Blade
October 18, 2024
Prudent person fallacy
Now, after nearly 30 years of ‘prudent person’ investing with hundreds of deals totaling tens of billions of dollars with terms like those in the Panda Power fund, STRS wants a 28.5 percent increase from taxpayers to bailout the fund.
Since 1997 Ohio’s public pensions and the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation have used the Orwellian “prudent person” standard to make the most risky, ill-fated investments in state history.
Rare coins and Beanie Babies in the portfolio managed by Toledoan Tom Noe, with such independence he was able to steal millions from the fund, was possible because of the Ohio legislature’s bad judgment. It’s a mistake the General Assembly has not corrected.
A $525 million loss by the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio in a private equity investment called Panda Power is revealing for the imprudence the “prudent person” law allows. STRS lost the entire investment. News of the investment debacle leaked from STRS in 2021.
The offering documents for the Panda Power fund shows the need for reform. The prospectus provided to the Ohio Retirement for Teachers Association’s pension consultant Edward Siedle is just like hundreds of other private investments in all of the Ohio pension fund portfolios.
The document demands secrecy. STRS was forbidden to share the document or disclose the information in the document without Panda’s written permission.
Panda warned that the investment in merchant power would bring “no significant returns for a substantial period of time.” The deal tied up the pension investment for 10 years with an option allowing Panda to extend the terms two more years.
The management fee of 2 percent on $525 million of committed capital is $10.5 million a year. If Panda produced more than an 8 percent return, the managers got 20 percent of that profit. Taxes and expenses were also borne by STRS. Panda warned they would be substantial.
The risk factor tied to the 20 percent profit share for Panda was red-flagged from day one. The agreement “creates an incentive to make more speculative investments than would otherwise be the case,” Panda warned in the prospectus for the fund. Panda told STRS they would be investing in “companies that have a checkered financial history.”
Panda warned they would be using leverage and investing in leveraged companies bringing an opportunity for enhanced returns or a large loss of capital.
The value of the investments would be solely determined by Panda with the warning that there could be a material difference between carrying value and market value.
Now, after nearly 30 years of “prudent person” investing with hundreds of deals totaling tens of billions of dollars with terms like those in the Panda Power fund, STRS wants a 28.5 percent increase from taxpayers to bail out the fund.
The prudent investors at the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund also want much more money from taxpayers for the same purpose.
Since 1997, the S&P 500, which used to be the staple of Ohio pension funds, has increased 1,073.11 percent, or 9.40 percent a year. This easily beats every Ohio pensions’ annual assumed rate of return.
The coming crisis is a manmade disaster by imprudent Ohio lawmakers. Simply requiring state pensions to make the terms of their investment contracts transparent would be enough to keep them out of one-sided deals like Panda Power.
Trina Prufer to STRS board: STRS has been shattered beyond recognition as a benevolent manager of retirement savings. The State of Ohio owns this, and needs to fix it, with an increase in funding, going directly into restoring benefits.
Trina Prufer's speech to STRS board
October 17, 2024
My
name is Trina Prufer. I retired at 30 years and was a School
Psychologist for 20 of those years. My husband passed away before
retiring, having taught Anthropology at Kent State University for 40
years.
The
title of this short presentation is: The
Pottery Barn Rule:
“You
break it, you own it”
I
would like to remind this board that teachers had nothing to do with
running up the STRS unfunded liability… that occurred because the
organization wasted far too much on mismanagement. Its core
responsibility was to pay the benefits obligated by the ORC and it
failed miserably in delivering on its mission.
Teachers
were assured of a secure lifelong benefit at an adequate percentage
of their final average salary (FAS), which in my day was 66%. That
was the purpose of the 3% annual, automatic cola, which is a normal
component of a defined-benefit pension, in a non-social security
state.
So,
what does that STRS defined benefit look like today? After ten years
without a cola, that 66% FAS diminishes to about 49% purchasing
power. After 20 years, which is the official plan to reach 100%
funding, the purchasing power reduces to about 36%. Additionally,
active teachers are paying 14% for a benefit with a normal cost of
11%. No other public teacher retirement system, in a non-social
security state, has ever harmed its members to this degree.
In
2012, STRS the Ohio Legislature took the easiest and most imprudent
way out of its funding dilemma. It shifted the blame and
responsibility of fixing the pension shortfall onto individual
teachers,
who
are the least able to absorb this enormous cost. Do teachers not have
the need to pay for groceries, housing, medicine and support care as
we age? Are we not human? Why is STRS even a retirement system if it
pushes its oldest retirees into poverty?
STRS
has been shattered beyond recognition as a benevolent manager of
retirement savings. The State of Ohio owns this, and needs to fix it,
with an increase in funding, going directly into restoring benefits.
Pay
what is owed, restructure STRS to reflect the needs of educators, and
rewrite the law, so state workers are protected from financial abuse.
The state legislature needs to take responsibility for what it broke,
and
just do, what needs to be done.
Toledo Blade: One-time check to be paid to retired Ohio teachers in December
Toledo Blade
Retired Ohio teachers to get 1-time checks in December
Thursday, October 17, 2024
Robin Beebe to STRS board: "if a cup of coffee, a box of popcorn, or a plate of cookies would not be prohibited under the Ohio Ethics Law, surely a simple piece of celebration cake should be acceptable?????"
Robin Beebe's speech to STRS board
Cathy Steinhauser to STRS board: Intimidating board members through lies is despicable. Do the right thing and restore our COLA sooner than later.
Suzanne Laird to STRS board: I’m begging, not for treats, but for what I and all Ohio teachers deserve: a secure and stable retirement.
Suzanne Laird's speech to STRS board
Dean Dennis to STRS board: Today, I still think adopting a formula-generated EA approach is more reasonable than following the 7% EA crowd. Remember, the crowd also has variable employer contribution rates, whereas we don’t. It’s time we demonstrate we are a top-tier pension system.
From Dean Dennis
October 17, 2024
October 17, 2024 - Dean Dennis, 35 yrs, Cincinnati Public Schools. ORTA Executive Chair.
I will read a quick section of the September 2024 Newsletter from the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System.
“The OPERS Board of Trustees approved updates to OPERS’ funding policies, establishing a decision-making framework to manage the future funding of the system's pension and health care plans.
The new policies came about because the trustees had expressed interest in creating a system to reduce funding risks by setting clear objective parameters honed on past experience that trustees will reference in the future to make prudent funding decisions.”
The new policies include the following update: Setting a systematic, formula-driven approach to identify potential actions for the trustees to manage funding and risks.
I bring this to your attention because on October 17, 2019, five years ago. I stood before the Board and presented the following:
Ohio Statute sets our funding period at 30 years. Over the last 40 years, has STRS earned less than 8% over any rolling 30 funding-year period? I believe we achieved around 8.5% over our previous 30-year period. So, why is our Earnings Assumption set at 7.45%, over 100 basis points less than what we are actually earning?
Why hasn't our Board adopted a reasonable EA formula that ties the actual earnings of our 30-year rolling funding periods and then adjusts the EA accordingly? Why can't we adopt an EA 50-60 basis points lower than what we earn and adjust accordingly every five years? If an EA of 7.9% were adopted, 60 basis points lower than what we are earning over our 30-year funding period, it would reduce billions from our 30-year liabilities. As fiduciaries, you could restore a COLA.
In March 2017, the Board drastically reduced the EA from 7.75% to 7.45%, dismissing the reality of our historical 30-year earning returns. Thirty months later, our 10-year earnings period netted a return of 10.44%, nearly 300 basis points above the current adopted EA. Adopting a reasonable formula-based earning assumption is not irresponsible; however, withholding benefits because of a lack of one is irresponsible.
Today, I still think adopting a formula-generated EA approach is more reasonable than following the 7% EA crowd. Remember, the crowd also has variable employer contribution rates, whereas we don’t. It’s time we demonstrate we are a top-tier pension system.