Saturday, December 03, 2011

Tom Curtis: Letter to retirees

From Tom Curtis, December 2, 2011
Dear STRS Retirees,
I choose to switch my insurance from AultCare to Aetna for the coming year. STRS subsequently made that change effective for me as of 12.1.11, which is the date I became eligible for Medicare. I thought that my Aetna coverage would not be effective until the beginning of 2012, but I was wrong. I received a notice from AultCare on 11.29.11 telling me my coverage with them expired on 11.30.11. Just one more surprise from STRS!
It was my understanding that if retirees chose to go to the Aetna plan, retirees were told that if "ANY" facility excepts Medicare, that they will honor their services.
Well, that is absolutely "not" true for the free fitness membership. I can only imagine when this type of situation will occur with another service I desire and/or require. STRS seems to always have exceptions to the rules as they are presented to us. Gee, does that sound familiar?
Because Aetna has now captured my/our traditional Medicare coverage, we are no longer on a traditional Medicare plan. Thus, we are restricted by whatever STRS has agreed too with that insurer.
We are not permitted to use the Silver Sneakers fitness plan that is offered through the traditional Medicare program. That is because Aetna/STRS have contracted with a subcontractor by the name of Healthway for the fitness membership and they only permit us to use the providers they have on a list.
I will not bore you with but a few more details. I have spent 3 days and 5-10 hours of time on the phone, and going to look at 3 facilities that are close to my home, all of which accept Medicare. Out of those 3, I am only permitted by our contract with Aetna/Healthways to enroll in one of those facilities. The one I am permitted to enroll in, has about 1/4th of the area and equipment that the YMCA has. The YMCA will accept the Medicare Silver Sneakers program, but because Aetna/Healthways does not accept the YMCA, I am not permitted to use that facility. Oh yeah, they are sorry for this inconvenience. Someone telling me they are sorry means absolutely nothing today.
Renee Beckum, in our STRS HC area tells me this is the only glitch in the Aetna insurance program and that no exceptions can be made. WHY do I not believe this will be the case?
I thought my anger with the management and board of the STRS had subsided. I guess I was wrong! Maybe the stress of what the STRS has put us retirees through over the past decade will cause me to have a 2nd heart attack. Why don't they get it? The stress they have placed on retirees because the board and management failed to properly fund our HCSF is making us all sick. I guess that works out for them, we die, they get to stop paying benefits.
Currently, my out-of-pocket HC costs for 2011 is in excess of $20k - over 50% of my pension. My wife is in a nursing home, due to her complications with dementia. I can no longer live within my means, due to my medical costs. This is all making me wonder if having died after my heart attack would not have been the better outcome?
Tom Curtis
Angry again.

Friday, December 02, 2011

Next CORE meeting to be held in January

From CORE, December 2, 2011
CORE (Concerned Ohio Retired Educators) will not NOT hold a December meeting due to the fact that the STRS board meeting is scheduled to be held the first week in December and our last CORE/STRS meetings were held just a week before Thanksgiving. We do encourage you to attend the STRS open board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, Dec. 8th at the STRS building at 275 East Broad Street in Columbus. Parking is free in the STRS parking garage located behind the building. We always suggest that you check the STRS website ( to confirm dates and times. CORE will hold its next meeting on Thursday, January 19th, 2012.

Thursday, December 01, 2011

STRS Board to meet December 7-8, 2011

From STRS, December 1, 2011
The State Teachers Retirement Board and Committee meetings currently scheduled at the STRS Ohio offices, 275 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, are as follows:
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
11 a.m. Disability Review Panel and Final Average Salary Committee (Executive Session)
Thursday, December 8, 2011
9 a.m. Audit Committee, followed by
Retirement Board Meeting
The Retirement Board meeting will come to order on Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011, following a 9 a.m. Audit Committee meeting. The agenda includes: a Report From the Investment Department, the Asset/Liability Study, Executive Director's Report, public participation, a Report From the Human Resource Services Department, a Report From the Member Benefits Department - Health Care, routine matters, old business, new business and any other matters requiring attention.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

More Principals speak out against DOE testing madness but....

From John Curry, November 30, 2011
...unlike Ohio, NY also rates principals, as well as educators, by test results. IT ALL DEPENDS UPON WHOSE OX IS GORED, DOESN'T IT? Maybe that's why Ohio principals still remain silent about Ohio's testing madness. Naw..that couldn't be, could it?

Monday, November 28, 2011

What...Principals staging a REVOLT? Yes, you read that correctly.........this is a first!

From John Curry, November 28, 2011
Active educators..please share this one with your principal!
"It’s education by humiliation,” Mr. Kaplan said. “I’ve never seen teachers and principals so degraded.”
NYC principals are standing up for teachers and to the state DOE and for the first time in history are finally revolting - a revolt that needs to take place and go viral all across the country. The lack of respect and degradation has finally reached a tipping point. It's about time.
Michael Winerip in the NYT reports How Principals are Protesting the Role of Testing in Evaluations:
Through the years there have been many bitter teacher strikes and too many student protests to count. But a principals’ revolt?
“Principals don’t revolt,” said Bernard Kaplan of Great Neck North High School on Long Island, who has been one for 20 years. “Principals want to go along with the system and do what they’re told.”
But President Obama and his signature education program, Race to the Top, along with John B. King Jr., the New York State commissioner of education, deserve credit for spurring what is believed to be the first principals’ revolt in history.
As of last night, 658 principals around the state had signed a letter — 488 of them from Long Island, where the insurrection began — protesting the use of students’ test scores to evaluate teachers’ and principals’ performance.
Their complaints are many: the evaluation system was put together in slapdash fashion, with no pilot program; there are test scores to evaluate only fourth-through-eighth-grade English and math teachers; and New York tests are so unreliable that they had to be rescaled radically last year, with proficiency rates in math and English dropping 25 percentage points overnight.
Mr. Kaplan, who runs one of the highest-achieving schools in the state, has been evaluating teachers since the education commissioner was a teenager. No matter. He is required by Nassau County officials to attend 10 training sessions, as is Carol Burris, the principal of South Side High School here, who was named the 2010 Educator of the Year by the School Administrators Association of New York State.
“It’s education by humiliation,” Mr. Kaplan said. “I’ve never seen teachers and principals so degraded.”
The trainers at these sessions, which are paid for by state and federal grants, have explained that they’re figuring out the new evaluation system as they go. To make the point, they’ve been showing a YouTube video with a fictional crew of mechanics who are having the time of their lives building an airplane in midair.
“It was supposed to be funny, but the room went silent,” Ms. Burris said. “These are people’s livelihoods we’re talking about.”
Last year New York was awarded $700 million as one of 11 states, along with the District of Columbia, to win a Race to the Top grant. The application process was chaotic, with Dr. King’s office making the deadline by just a few hours. To win a grant, states had to pledge to follow policy priorities of the Obama administration, like evaluating teachers by student test scores, even though there were no implementation plans yet.
New York committed to an evaluation process that is based 60 percent on principal observations and other subjective measures, and from 20 to 40 percent on state tests, depending on the local district.
In written responses to questions, Dr. King said while there are bugs in the system, “we are confident that as the state law on teacher evaluations phases in over the next couple of years, those educators charged with ensuring its successful implementation will do so professionally.”
Asked if he was surprised by the number of principals who had signed, he wrote, “It’s not at all surprising” that the introduction of a new evaluation system “would produce anxiety.”
Although testing is central to the education reform movement, the word “testing” is considered crude in elite education circles, and in a three-page response to questions, the commissioner never actually used the t-word. However, he did include multiple euphemisms like “data on the growth in student learning.”
“A significant body of research,” he wrote, “demonstrates that an educator’s past impact on student learning is a strong predictor of that educator’s future impact on student learning and a useful component of a fair, transparent, and rigorous multiple measures evaluation system.”
Merryl H. Tisch, chancellor of the Board of Regents, said that because of the new “scientific, objective” evaluation system, the public would see that teachers were being held to a rigorous standard and would not dislike them so much. “I’m seeing a much more positive focus about teaching, and I like that,” she said.
It is hard to overstate how angry the principals who signed are. Mario Fernandez, principal of Stillwater High School near Saratoga, called the evaluation process a product of “ludicrous, shallow thinking.”
“My gosh, it seems to be slapped together,” he said. “They’re expecting atornado to go through a junkyard and have a brand new Mercedes pop up.”
Katie Zahedi, principal of Linden Avenue Middle School in Red Hook in Dutchess County. said the training session she attended was “two days of total nonsense.”
“I have a Ph.D., I’m in a school every day, and some consultant is supposed to be teaching me to do evaluations,” she said. “It takes your breath away it’s so awful.”
She said one good thing about the new evaluation system was that it had united teachers, principals and administrators in their contempt for the state education department.
Several interviewed said the most reliable way to evaluate teachers was to make 5-to-10-minute “walk through” visits to their classes several times a month. “My principal is frequently in my class, and that’s the way it should be,” said Marguerite Izzo, a fifth-grade teacher in Malverne, on Long Island, who was the 2007 state teacher of the year.
Ms. Izzo calls students up to her desk, one by one, every day to discuss their work. “It’s the same for children or teachers: immediate feedback is best, while it’s still fresh in their minds,” she said.
The principals’ letter was drafted last month by Ms. Burris and Sean Feeney of the Wheatley School. “We tried and tried to talk to the state, but they don’t listen to us,” Ms. Burris said.
In his responses, Dr. King wrote, “The principals do raise some legitimate concerns that we are carefully addressing.” But he also wrote, “The structure of the evaluation system — including the use of data on the growth in student learning — is set in state statute.” (Translation: Testing full speed ahead.)
About 300 principals out of 4,500 in the state had signed by early November, when Newsday wrote a front-page story about the letter. There has been steady growth since. Three-fourths of Long Island principals have placed their names on the list.
Outside of Long Island, Westchester County has the most principals on the letter, 31.
Only 18 out of 1,500 from New York City have signed. Ms. Burris is not sure if the principals are not aware, or if they fear retribution from Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who is a big supporter of using data to calculate growth in student learning.
Larry KehresMount Union Collge
Division III
web page counter
Vermont Teddy Bear Company