I am David Quolke and I am the President of the Cleveland Teachers Union.
There are many issues that I could talk to you about today. Many issues that I –
and my members – think should be brought to your attention. However, today, I
need to talk about Non-Reappointments.
The first week in May, 70 of my members received notice that they were
being recommended for non-reappointment. Now that number could be off because
these were the numbers that I was given by the media after they spoke with CEO
Gordon or someone from the District. When talking to the media – I explained
that many of my members were blindsided when they received this news and that
the CTU was blindsided also. You see, I have many cases of members who had good
evaluations – developing and skilled all year long, who were taking on
leadership roles in their schools, who have increased student achievement, who
have a composite evaluation with developing and skilled ratings. So, yes, when
these teachers were suddenly told in May that they were going to be recommended
for non-reappointment they were indeed blindsided.
Before you say to me – David, you know that state law does not require poor
evaluations in order to non-reappoint a limited contract teacher. I know. I
know. However, when the media came to the CEO regarding the teachers that were
being recommended for non-reappointment – here are some of the quotes directly
from CEO Gordon:
“We have a few people that either can’t or won’t. These are the people that
our principals say are not meeting the expectations for our kids.”
“At some point if you are not getting the job done, we shouldn’t continue
to pay you to do it.”
“It’s new for us to evaluate this thoroughly. It’s part of the Cleveland
Plan to make sure that we have the right people in front of kids.”
So I ask you –
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers with Skilled
evaluations?
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers with Skilled
evaluations who have made a year’s worth of growth with their students in just 5
months?
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers that were
hired in October, November, December and are Developing (where a new teacher
should be) or a combination of Developing and Skilled?
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers that are
Developing or a combination of Developing and Skilled who are taking on
leadership roles, such as AR Champion or in servicing staff on SLOs (at the
request of the principal) or who are accepting students from the local
universities to observe their classes?
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers that start in
September, score Developing and Skilled on evaluations, and take over 100 hours
in voluntary professional development?
Is it a part of the Cleveland Plan to non-reappoint teachers that are
described like this by an administrator “His relationship with scholars and
teachers resulted in one of the most successful classrooms in the district. I
placed some scholars in his classroom knowing that it would be their last chance
for success within CMSD.
I hope that none of this is a part of the Cleveland Plan. If it is – this
should serve as a dangerous warning to all people enrolled in local teacher
preparation programs – Come work in Cleveland where we ignore teacher
Development and get rid of you simply because we can.
I know what you are thinking and what some people are already saying. The
teachers union protects bad teachers. David Quolke wants bad teachers teaching
kids no matter what the cost. I know that these words are already echoing in
city hall, at 1111, and throughout the community. Let me be very clear – THAT IS
NOT TRUE. It is a lie. I am furious about these non-reappointments. The officers
of the CTU have worked around the clock in hearings for members over the last
two weeks. There are good teachers that are doing the things that I want my
daughter’s teachers to do. There are good teachers doing the things and the good
work that our development and evaluation system ask for. There are good teachers
doing what is needed to increase student learning and student achievement. They
do not deserve to be recommended to this Board for non-reappointment.
So obviously a logical question would be – why are these people being
recommended for non-reappointment? I have no answer for you. I can only
speculate, but it is certainly a question that must be asked and answered by the
people who engineered this massive non-reappointment of good and qualified
teachers.
I think some people will look at tonight’s Board agenda and see that one of
the items is a resolution to approve $400,000 to hire Teach For America
teachers. Are these non-reappointments to make room for Teach for America? I
will not bash Teach for America. They are our colleagues and once hired work
shoulder to shoulder with us trying their very best to educate our students. But
the irony of non-reappointing new teachers in order to replace them with Teach
for America is that TFA does what the district should be doing – provide mentors
and support. That is the actual Developing of a teacher that CMSD has completely
abandoned.
Great way to recruit and develop a talented work force.
Sounds more to me like the beatings will continue until the morale
improves. Not a good strategy for real reform.