Friday, October 26, 2012
From Don Gatchell, October 26, 2012
The hype about the law, including its impact on Medicare, is
confusing — and scary. Here’s the truth
by: Beth Howard | from: AARP The Magazine | September
2012
The looming presidential election is heating up the rhetoric on health care
reform. But how much of it is true?
“The amount of misinformation about the Affordable Care Act [ACA] —
including outright lies — is astonishing,” says Shana Alex Lavarreda, Ph.D.,
director of health insurance studies at the UCLA Center for Health Policy
Research. “The point of the law is to make the health system better for each
person, for less cost to society overall.”
Get the facts about the new health care law. — Photo by Adam Voorhes But
myths about the ACA abound. Some of the most persistent:
MYTH 1: The new law cuts Medicare drastically,
so I won't be able to get quality health care.
The Affordable
Care Act (ACA) in fact prohibits cuts to guaranteed Medicare benefits. There
are provisions in the law to help curb the soaring costs of Medicare, but
savings will come from reining in unreasonable payments to providers, taxing
high-premium plans (beginning in the year 2018), cracking
(Click image to enlarge.)
down on fraud and
waste, and encouraging patient-centered, coordinated care, says Sara R. Collins,
Ph.D., vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, a private research foundation
focused on health care.
The ACA also covers preventive care designed to avert chronic conditions
like heart disease and diabetes, which currently cost billions. Medicare
beneficiaries get an annual
wellness exam as well as numerous screenings and vaccines free of charge.
The new system also improves coordination of care between doctors, nurses and
other providers to prevent harmful and costly hospital readmissions.
Finally, the law closes the infamous Medicare Part D prescription drug
"doughnut hole," in which Medicare beneficiaries paid full price for prescription
drugs after exceeding a certain dollar limit each year. Now enrollees who
reach the doughnut hole get large discounts, and by 2020, the hole will close.
MYTH 2: I've heard that Medicare Advantage plans will be cut or
taken away.
The ACA does not eliminate Medicare Advantage plans, which are privately
administered plans that provide benefits to about a quarter of Americans with
Medicare. These plans were created to bring market efficiencies to Medicare, but
they actually cost taxpayers 14 percent more per enrollee than the traditional
Medicare program does. The ACA aims to bring costs back into line.
"The plans are still required to provide at least the same benefits as
those available through traditional Medicare plans," says Stuart Guterman, vice
president of the Commonwealth Fund. "And for the first time, the law ensures
that plans that perform better will be paid better, so the care they provide
should improve."
MYTH 3: I'll have to wait longer to see my doctor — or I won't be
able to see my doctor at all.
"If your current plan allows you to see any physician in the plan, nothing
will change," says UCLA's Lavarreda. Health plans are already building bigger
networks in anticipation of new patients, so choices could be even greater.
Although the law doesn't specifically address wait times, many of its
provisions are aimed at improving quality of care, including some that encourage
more physicians to become primary care doctors.
MYTH 4: If I have Medicare, I will need to get more or different
insurance.
Some people have confused the ACA's "individual mandate" with a requirement
to obtain additional insurance on top of Medicare. "That's just not accurate,"
says Guterman. "Medicare beneficiaries will continue to have Medicare, and
there's no requirement that they get additional coverage beyond what they
already have."
MYTH 5: The new law "raids Medicare of $716 billion."
It's simply not true. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Congress'
independent and nonpartisan budget scorekeeper, recently estimated that the
changes to Medicare in the ACA will reduce spending by a total of $716 billion
between 2013 and 2022.
"That's where the number comes from," says Guterman. The largest portion of
these savings would come from changes to provider payments and correcting
overpayments to insurance companies that offer private Medicare plans. "And that
projected savings will be used to close the prescription drug 'doughnut hole';
to pay for free, preventive care for consumers; and to increase coverage for the
uninsured," Lavarreda says.
All guaranteed benefits in Medicare were protected. These measures actually
strengthen Medicare's fiscal viability: Before the ACA was passed, Medicare's
Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which is used to pay hospital bills for Medicare
beneficiaries, was projected to run out of money by 2017; after the law was
passed, that date was pushed back to 2024.
MYTH 6: The law is going to bankrupt America.
Not according to the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation, nonpartisan
entities that estimated health reform will actually reduce the nation's deficit
by $210 billion between 2012 and 2021, by reducing subsidies to private
insurance companies, cracking down on waste and fraud, and reining in profits.
"If we don't get health care spending under control, that's going to
bankrupt America," says Shannon Brownlee, acting policy director at the New
America Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank.
MYTH 7: The new law will drive up premiums astronomically.
That's an unlikely scenario. "A significant number of the uninsured people
who will be brought into the system with the ACA are the 'young invincibles,' "
says Brownlee, describing the 18-to-29 age group. "Their relative good health
helps to subsidize care for less healthy people."
The law also strengthens states' power to question unreasonable rate
increases, whether because of age, preexisting conditions or any other reason.
And the law's "medical loss ratio requirement" dictates that 80 to 85 percent of
premiums be spent on medical costs. As of Aug. 1, approximately 12.8 million
Americans received an estimated $1.1 billion in rebates from insurance companies
in cases where overhead expenses exceeded 15 to 20 percent of premiums charged
in 2011.
As for Medicare Part B premiums (which cover doctors' services and
outpatient care), those are determined by a formula designed decades ago by
Congress, based on the previous year's Medicare health care costs. In essence,
the government pays 75 percent of Part B costs, and Medicare beneficiaries pay
the remaining 25 percent. The law did not change this formula. (There is no
truth to a rumor that Part B premiums will rise from $99.90 a month in 2012 to
$247 a month by 2014, Lavarreda says.)
MYTH 8: If I can't afford to buy health insurance, I'll be taxed —
or worse.
If you can't afford health insurance because of financial hardship (if the
cheapest plan exceeds 8 percent of your income), you will be exempt from the tax
penalty. Special taxes (from $95 the first year to $695 a year by 2017) will be
phased in over the next seven years for those who choose to forgo coverage. Even
then, the government will not criminally prosecute or place property liens on
people who ignore the tax. At worst, the IRS will withhold the tax amount from
individuals' tax refunds.
MYTH 9: I'm a small-business owner and I'll pay big fines if I
don't provide health insurance to my employees.
Small businesses that already provide health insurance will not be
affected. "Penalties for not providing health coverage apply only to companies
with 50 or more workers," says the Commonwealth Fund's Collins.
In fact, many small companies will be eligible for tax credits to offset
the burden of providing insurance. From now through 2013, eligible employers
will receive a business credit for up to 35 percent of their contribution toward
employees' premiums. For 2014 and beyond, the tax credit rises to as much as 50
percent of the contribution. These credits apply to companies with fewer than 25
full-time employees whose average annual salaries are less than $50,000.
Companies with more than 50 workers that don't provide coverage will be subject
to a fine of $2,000 to $3,000 per employee per year.
MYTH 10: The ACA basically turns our health care system into
universal health care. So now some government bureaucrat will decide how and
when I get treated.
Health care under the ACA will not be government run. "The law builds on
and strengthens the existing private insurance system," says Collins. "Fifty to
60 percent of people will continue to get insurance through an employer, and
people who are buying their own insurance will still buy private health plans.
The choice of plan is not dictated, and you'll be able to choose the provider
you want — no government bureaucrat involved."
The health care system envisioned by the law aims to be universal in one
way: by making health insurance accessible to the vast majority of Americans.
"That's a good thing," says Brownlee. "We'll have more people covered."
MYTH 11: If my state doesn't set up an insurance exchange, I can't
get health coverage.
The ACA calls for each state to create an exchange, a marketplace of
private health insurance companies. This will give individuals and small
businesses a place to shop for affordable coverage, with subsidies provided,
starting in 2014. But some states have declined to set up an exchange or have
moved slowly.
"If a state hasn't done it, then the Department of Health and Human
Services will set up an exchange in that state," says Collins. "Each state will
have an exchange operated by either the state or the federal government. And tax
credits will be available in your state, regardless of who is running it."
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Dr. Leone explains why STRS reviews disability retirements every two years
From Dennis Leone, October 25, 2012
About 10 years ago, STRS changed internal procedures for reviewing those
who had been granted disability retirement. One change included re-evaluating
recipients every 2 years to determine the appropriateness of the original
disability retirement decision. This was necessary because STRS learned that
many were engaged in activities that were clearly inconsistent with the reasons
associated with the original decision.
The examples were pretty bad, which caused a re-evaluation of everyone
every two years. If the 5-member Medical Review Board at STRS determines the
recipients are "disabled" during the re-evaluation in the same manner they were
when the original decision was made, then nothing is changed and everything is
fine.
STRS is NOT trying to remove retirees from their disability
retirement. There is no sinister motivation to do it. Rather, STRS desires to
keep the process squeaky clean, honest and accurate. That is all. I recall as
a Board member that we could not use personal doctor letters as the final
judgment. If STRS did that, no disability retirement EVER would be
denied......not one. Historically, I would guess that about two-thirds of
original requests are denied by the Medical Review Board. When one receives it
initially, he/she has personally convinced the Medical Review Board that it was
right thing to do medically.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
STRS current asset value as of 9/30/12
From Mario Iacone, October 23, 2012
CURRENT ASSET VALUE as of
9/30/2012
65.5 Billion
65.5 Billion
ASSET VALUE as of
7/31//2012
64 Billion
64 Billion
ASSET VALUE as of APRIL
30,2012
65.2 Billion
65.2 Billion
HIGH ASSET VALUE....2007
approx 80 Billion
approx 80 Billion
LOW ASSET VALUE...early
2009
approx 47 Billion
approx 47 Billion
START of CURRENT FISCAL YEAR
approx 66.2 Billion
approx 66.2 Billion
approx 16 Billion BELOW 2007 HIGH and
approx 17 Billion ABOVE 2009 LOW
approx 17 Billion ABOVE 2009 LOW
Monday, October 22, 2012
Some interesting comments on the October STRS Board News
From John Curry, October 20, 2012
A decrease in member payroll, eh? My, my....what a non-surprise! Thank you
Wall St. and your lack of regulations. Just think how much worse this would have
been had SB 5 passed and charter schools had their way with the legislature!
Hey, I got a grand idea....let’s eliminate public schools all together and watch
our STRS kitty go to zero! JUST KIDDING......the last phrase was said tongue in
cheek.........BUT HOPEFULLY YOU NOW CAN SEE WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT!
John
From Dennis Leone, October 20, 2012
Stunning, isn’t it, that STRS is now saying in 2012 what I screamed about
in 2008-2009, that same year ORTA flat-out refused to print what I said in their
newsletter.
From Kathie Bracy, October 22, 2012
No surprise there!